Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was unveiled 5 years before the WG-4 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H10 matches up against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-H10 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-4 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-H10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the WG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and WG-4.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $330 |