Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8000 was announced 19 months before the VG-110 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the 8000 scores vs the VG-110 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Olympus VG-110. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus VG-110
8000 | VG-110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus 8000
VG-110 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Olympus VG-110
8000 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the 8000 vs the VG-110.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and VG-110 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and VG-110.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you should really factor the production date of the products into consideration. The older 8000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Olympus VG-110 |
Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $380 | $150 |