Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-H10 was brought out 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-H10 scores against the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-H10 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-H10
WG-4 GPS | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | June 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-H10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 provides external measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 against the WG-4 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $210 |