Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| EX-H10 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-5 GPS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| EX-H10 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 against the WG-5 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WG-5 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $500 |
