Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was announced 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 grades vs the WG-6 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-H10 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-6 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 105 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-H10 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 and the WG-6.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WG-6 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and WG-6.
All in all, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to provide you with more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 246 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $271 |
