Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-H10 was launched 11 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-H10 scores vs the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-H10 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-70 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 129 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-H10 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H10 and the WG-70.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WG-70 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and WG-70.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $280 |