Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H10 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was revealed 14 years before the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-H10 scores vs the WG-80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H10 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-H10
| WG-80 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | June 2009 | Newer by 157 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-H10 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 features external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the WG-80.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WG-80 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and WG-80.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-80 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $300 |