Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung CL80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was revealed 6 months prior to the CL80 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-H10 grades versus the CL80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung CL80. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung CL80
| EX-H10 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-H10
| CL80 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung CL80
| EX-H10 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the CL80.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and CL80 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and CL80.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung CL80 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung CL80 |
| Other name | - | ST5500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $400 |
