Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a78f/9a78f47f6e7ef816c7b7af0c8d3864f225321000" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cfa/61cfa7078e9ac6225a553418caffb93a2136e3af" alt="Samsung Galaxy NX front Samsung Galaxy NX front"
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Introduced June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung Galaxy NX, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Galaxy NX (20MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and Galaxy NX (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-H10 was manufactured 5 years prior to the Galaxy NX which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy NX being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-H10 grades versus the Galaxy NX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung Galaxy NX. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung Galaxy NX
EX-H10 | Galaxy NX |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Casio EX-H10
Galaxy NX | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | June 2009 | More modern by 49 months |
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung Galaxy NX
EX-H10 | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy NX has dimensions of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") along with a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung Galaxy NX in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the Galaxy NX.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b380/7b3804c80dc80d0d18a162fec0ef585c0190aa1c" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and Galaxy NX is 93 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04114/0411418c7aed0105441d2168c65ad18753111b59" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and Galaxy NX.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-H10 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung Galaxy NX will render more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21ee9/21ee9abc3adb630f931551e2f47c28cb481bde01" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f009b/f009bdd0665ba4ab23ee570650628b08fbf4c30a" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2013-06-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 495g (1.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $1,300 |