Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was released 3 years earlier than the MV800 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-H10 scores versus the MV800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-H10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-H10
| MV800 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 | June 2009 | More recent by 27 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung MV800
| EX-H10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the MV800.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and MV800 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The photograph below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and MV800.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung MV800 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $499 |