Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a78f/9a78f47f6e7ef816c7b7af0c8d3864f225321000" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d001/6d00199fa554daddf1699da91ea808290d954e81" alt="Samsung NX2000 front Samsung NX2000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-H10 was revealed 5 years earlier than the NX2000 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the NX2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung NX2000. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung NX2000
EX-H10 | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Casio EX-H10
NX2000 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | June 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
Screen dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung NX2000
EX-H10 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the NX2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7827b/7827b1f18fe4ae35664a2f799c5088740414255f" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and NX2000 is 93 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24754/247548a70675c7b87b64fa2f43bc061d04f68f2a" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and NX2000.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H10 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX2000 will resolve more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19c76/19c76b015bd0ac9f9ad6a9a5eba7bb1cb9fa3732" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/436b1/436b1245985e93849076d69cd4630a184d80fa3a" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 228 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $599 |