Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102
Portability
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Portability
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H10 was announced 6 months after the SL102 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H10 scores versus the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-H10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-H10
| SL102 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung SL102
| EX-H10 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 vs the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and SL102.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H10 to produce greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H10 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography features
you can focus manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
provides face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lighter than competition (116g)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H10 Travel photography information
Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
lighter than competition (116g)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
good maximum aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL102 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
good maximum aperture (f)
provides face detection focus
lighter than competition (116 grams)
wide angle not good (35mm)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $300 | $130 |