Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung ST100, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H10 was announced 6 months before the ST100 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-H10 grades versus the ST100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung ST100. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-H10 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-H10
| ST100 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung ST100
| EX-H10 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung ST100 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung ST100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 versus the ST100.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and ST100 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and ST100.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung ST100 to give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung ST100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $250 |
