Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung ST65, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H10 was announced 19 months earlier than the ST65 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-H10 grades versus the ST65 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-H10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-H10
| ST65 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | June 2009 | Fresher by 19 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung ST65
| EX-H10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 offers external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the ST65.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and ST65.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung ST65 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $130 |