Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was introduced 2 months earlier than the TL225 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-H10 matches up vs the TL225 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-H10 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-H10
| TL225 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung TL225
| EX-H10 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2009 |  | August 2009 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 provides physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 vs the TL225.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and TL225.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 187 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $488 |