Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB1100F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H10 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB1100F and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-H10 grades against the WB1100F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB1100F
| EX-H10 | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-H10
| WB1100F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB1100F
| EX-H10 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") having a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB1100F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 against the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WB1100F is 93 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and WB1100F.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB1100F to resolve greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 512 gr (1.13 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |