Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H10 scores against the WB2200F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-H10 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-H10
| WB2200F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-H10 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and WB2200F is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The visual here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and WB2200F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $599 |
