Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H10 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-H10 grades against the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-H10 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-H10
| WB350F | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | June 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-H10 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H10 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 vs the WB350F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and WB350F is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and WB350F.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) | 276 gr (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $260 |