Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced June 2009
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-H10 was revealed 5 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H10 scores versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-H10 WB35F 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-H10

 WB35F EX-H10 
LaunchedJanuary 2014June 2009Fresher by 55 months

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-H10 WB35F 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has got external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WB35F.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and WB35F.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H10
Portrait photography with Samsung WB35F
27
focusing manually
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
37
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Street photography info
Samsung WB35F Street photography info
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography features
Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
70
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
41
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging features
Samsung WB35F Vlogging features
28
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
31
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-06-11 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 7cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.60 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 gr (0.43 lb) 194 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $300 $130