Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H10 was revealed 5 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-H10 scores versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-H10 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-H10
WB35F | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | June 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Samsung WB35F
EX-H10 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has got external dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-H10 versus the WB35F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to produce more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $300 | $130 |