Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a78f/9a78f47f6e7ef816c7b7af0c8d3864f225321000" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H10 front Casio Exilim EX-H10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-H10 was manufactured 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-H10 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H10
DP2 Quattro | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | June 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-H10 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 and the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/508e1/508e1a67f921895b37f619bf5131a14522da331a" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24bbd/24bbd735b98ff3780bf1d92cc336e9e0dcdae3e1" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-H10 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27357/27357204c937caca689862c51cfd340c095a6dfc" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b27/30b277fcd683f788142856f66fa48c86413fff3b" alt="Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $931 |