Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced June 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-H10 was manufactured 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H10 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-H10

 DP2 Quattro EX-H10 
ReleasedFebruary 2014June 2009More recent by 56 months
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-H10 DP2 Quattro 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H10 and the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-H10 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H10
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
27
you can focus manually
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-H10 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
48
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
57
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
53
MP count decent (20MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
41
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
manual mode not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
59
manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
28
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-06-11 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 7cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.60 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $300 $931