Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Replacement is Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was introduced 5 years after the SD10 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-H10 grades vs the SD10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Sigma SD10. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-H10 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2009 |  | March 2004 | Newer by 64 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-H10
| SD10 | EX-H10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma SD10
| EX-H10 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 vs the SD10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SD10 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and SD10.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H10 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-H10 will offer you extra detail using its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-H10 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $198 |