Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H10 was announced 7 years before the Quattro and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-H10 grades against the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma Quattro
| EX-H10 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Casio EX-H10
| Quattro | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 81 months |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma Quattro
| EX-H10 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 and the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H10 and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and Quattro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-H10 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give extra detail with its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 29MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $738 |
