Clicky

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-H10 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
  • 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
  • Introduced June 2009
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-H10 versus Sigma Quattro H, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) provide different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-H10 was unveiled 7 years before the Quattro H which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-H10 matches up against the Quattro H in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sigma Quattro H

 EX-H10 Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-H10

 Quattro H EX-H10 
ReleasedFebruary 2016June 2009More modern by 81 months
Screen resolution1620k230kCrisper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sigma Quattro H

 EX-H10 Quattro H 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-H10 versus Sigma Quattro H in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 versus the Quattro H.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and Quattro H is 93 and 78 respectively.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H10 and Quattro H.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H10 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will give greater detail having an extra 33MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-H10
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro H
27
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
83
focusing manually
fantastic megapixels (45 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Street photography information
Sigma Quattro H Street photography information
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
70
decent sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-H10
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro H
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
71
fantastic megapixels (45MP)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Travel photography factors
Sigma Quattro H Travel photography factors
57
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
65
weather sealing
fantastic megapixels (45MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography details
Sigma Quattro H Landscape photography details
41
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
75
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is decent (3")
fantastic megapixels (45 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H10 Vlogging advice
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging advice
28
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
26
includes face detect focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video ( pixels)
does not have microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-H10 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-H10 and Sigma Quattro H
 Casio Exilim EX-H10Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Make Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-H10 Sigma sd Quattro H
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-06-11 2016-02-23
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 45 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 6200 x 4152
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.2-5.7 -
Macro focus distance 7cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.4
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-90 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $1,134