Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H10 was introduced 3 years earlier than the TX200V and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H10 grades versus the TX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sony TX200V
| EX-H10 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Casio EX-H10
| TX200V | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | June 2009 | Fresher by 32 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sony TX200V
| EX-H10 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-H10 vs the TX200V.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and TX200V is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and TX200V.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony TX200V to resolve more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-06-11 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $500 |