Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-S200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-S200 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H15 was released 6 months prior to the EX-S200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-H15 scores against the EX-S200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Casio Exilim EX-S200. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Casio EX-S200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-S200
| EX-H15 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-S200 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-S200
| EX-H15 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Casio EX-S200 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-S200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the EX-S200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and EX-S200 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and EX-S200.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files though you should always factor the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-S200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-S200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-08-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-120 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $300 | $0 |
