Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-Z270, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Casio. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and EX-Z270 (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and EX-Z270 (1/2.5") feature different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was manufactured 13 months after the EX-Z270 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-H15 scores versus the EX-Z270 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Casio Exilim EX-Z270. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Casio EX-Z270 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-Z270
| EX-H15 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+346k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-Z270 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-Z270
| EX-H15 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 offers physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z270 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-Z270 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the EX-Z270.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and EX-Z270 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and EX-Z270.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-H15 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Casio EX-H15 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-H15 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z270 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.6-7.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 111g (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-80 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |
