Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H15 versus Casio EX-Z800, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-Z800 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H15 was released 6 months prior to the EX-Z800 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-H15 grades against the EX-Z800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Casio Exilim EX-Z800. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Casio EX-Z800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-Z800
EX-H15 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Casio EX-H15
EX-Z800 | EX-H15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-Z800
EX-H15 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | August 2010 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 has got outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z800 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 versus Casio EX-Z800 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 against the EX-Z800.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and EX-Z800 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The image here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and EX-Z800.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of files though you really should take the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-Z800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-08-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 124g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $150 |