Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-ZR300 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was unveiled 3 years before the EX-ZR300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H15 grades against the EX-ZR300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-ZR300 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 features external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR300 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 versus the EX-ZR300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and EX-ZR300 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and EX-ZR300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2012-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $329 |