Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-ZR300 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H15 was unveiled 3 years before the EX-ZR300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-H15 grades against the EX-ZR300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-ZR300 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 features external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR300 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 versus the EX-ZR300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and EX-ZR300 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and EX-ZR300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2012-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $329 |