Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-H15 versus Casio EX-ZR400, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the EX-ZR400 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H15 was released 4 years prior to the EX-ZR400 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-H15 scores against the EX-ZR400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR400. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Casio EX-H15
| EX-ZR400 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Casio EX-ZR400
| EX-H15 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 461k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR400 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Casio EX-ZR400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 and the EX-ZR400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and EX-ZR400 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and EX-ZR400.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-H15 vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 30.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |
