Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H15 was introduced 6 months after the S200EXR and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H15 grades against the S200EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H15 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-H15
| S200EXR | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-H15 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S200EXR has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-H15 against the S200EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and S200EXR is 93 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and S200EXR.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-H15 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-H15 will offer you more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively.
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also Known as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lb) | 865 grams (1.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $500 |