Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2900HD
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-H15 and FujiFilm S2800HD, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the S2800HD (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H15 was introduced within a month of the S2800HD which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-H15 grades against the S2800HD in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| EX-H15 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Casio EX-H15
| S2800HD | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and FujiFilm S2800HD
| EX-H15 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | February 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the FujiFilm S2800HD has specifications of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and FujiFilm S2800HD in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 vs the S2800HD.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and S2800HD is 93 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and S2800HD.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photos but you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD |
| Also called | - | FinePix S2900HD |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 99% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | 437 gr (0.96 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $260 |