Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was released 4 years prior to the Fujifilm F900EXR and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm F900EXR | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm F900EXR
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 provides outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Fujifilm F900EXR has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-H15 versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-H15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | EXR II |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $380 |