Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm S8300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H15 was introduced 4 years before the Fujifilm S8300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-H15 grades versus the Fujifilm S8300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Fujifilm FinePix S8300. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Fujifilm S8300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm S8300
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm S8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm S8300 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm S8300
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm S8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8300 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm S8300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 and the Fujifilm S8300.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm S8300 is 93 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing specs. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm S8300.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S8300 to show greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm S8300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-1008mm (42.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 0cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/7000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $200 |