Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was unveiled 7 months after the Fujifilm Z33WP and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H15 scores vs the Fujifilm Z33WP with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Casio EX-H15
| Fujifilm Z33WP | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Fujifilm Z33WP
| EX-H15 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z33WP has specifications of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 and the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and Fujifilm Z33WP is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and Fujifilm Z33WP.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to render greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 110 grams (0.24 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $197 |
