Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15/Casio-EX-H15-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Z950 front Kodak EasyShare Z950 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Z950/Kodak-Z950-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H15 was announced 5 months earlier than the Z950 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-H15 scores vs the Z950 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Kodak Z950
EX-H15 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Casio EX-H15
Z950 | EX-H15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Kodak Z950
EX-H15 | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | June 2010 | Similar age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has got external dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has sizing of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Kodak Z950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the Z950.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and Z950.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-H15 to give greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z950-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $250 |