Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Announced February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- Later Model is Nikon S9900

Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-H15 and Nikon S9700, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-H15 was launched 5 years earlier than the S9700 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H15 matches up against the S9700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Nikon Coolpix S9700. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Nikon S9700
EX-H15 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Casio EX-H15
S9700 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Nikon S9700
EX-H15 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9700 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 and Nikon S9700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 vs the S9700.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and S9700 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and S9700.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S9700 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $350 |