Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-H15 was announced 12 months later than the SP-565UZ which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-H15 scores vs the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-H15 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-H15
| SP-565UZ | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-H15 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 provides outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-H15 against the SP-565UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and SP-565UZ is 93 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $400 |