Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was brought out 8 months after the 9000 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-H15 grades vs the 9000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus 9000
| EX-H15 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-H15
| 9000 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus 9000
| EX-H15 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 has physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 against the 9000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and 9000.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-H15 to give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-H15 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Other name | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $300 |