Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus SH-2
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus SH-1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H15 was unveiled 5 years before the SH-1 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-H15 scores against the SH-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus SH-1
EX-H15 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Casio EX-H15
SH-1 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 51 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus SH-1
EX-H15 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H15 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus SH-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-H15 against the SH-1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and SH-1 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and SH-1.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus SH-1 to offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $349 |