Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus SH-2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-H15 was manufactured 6 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-H15 scores against the SH-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus SH-2
| EX-H15 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Casio EX-H15
| SH-2 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 63 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus SH-2
| EX-H15 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-H15 and the SH-2.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and SH-2 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H15 and SH-2.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus SH-2 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $399 |
