Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-H15 was introduced 7 months after the 8000 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-H15 scores versus the 8000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus 8000
| EX-H15 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Casio EX-H15
| 8000 | EX-H15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus 8000
| EX-H15 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 and the 8000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and 8000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and 8000.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-H15 to give you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern EX-H15 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 182g (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $380 |