Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was introduced 4 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-H15 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-H15 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-H15
| TG-2 iHS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 461k | Sharper screen (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-H15 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 vs the TG-2 iHS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and TG-2 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-H15 to give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $380 |