Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Revealed July 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Pentax. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-H15 was revealed 4 years earlier than the MX-1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-H15 grades versus the MX-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Pentax MX-1. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Pentax MX-1
| EX-H15 | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Casio EX-H15
| MX-1 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Pentax MX-1
| EX-H15 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") and a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 against the MX-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and MX-1 is 93 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and MX-1.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Casio EX-H15 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-H15 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 391 gr (0.86 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $300 | $400 |