Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh CX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and CX5 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-H15 was manufactured 18 months before the CX5 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-H15 | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-H15
| CX5 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh CX5
| EX-H15 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-H15 against the CX5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and CX5 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and CX5.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-H15 to show more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $399 |