Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GR, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is very well matched but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-H15 was released 4 years prior to the GR and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-H15 grades vs the GR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh GR
EX-H15 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-H15
GR | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GR
EX-H15 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H15 has physical dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H15 and the GR.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and GR is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H15 and GR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Ricoh GR will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $971 |