Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0e5/ee0e57c6de5b6590c0c70f89b85280638d136a77" alt="Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-H15 was launched 6 months later than the GR Digital III and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-H15 scores against the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-H15 | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-H15
GR Digital III | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-H15 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 versus the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8a3a/a8a3ac00204edf0efd4bdba071caf38c66382864" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and GR Digital III is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/887d2/887d257c3c4bc290f95f507774e1b6f2c9ecd3b1" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and GR Digital III.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-H15 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51e72/51e722e06c8a6e1598150c621afdb08f055c76b7" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fd9f/5fd9fa88fb4955e178c1047213de8f4ec2aa82b7" alt="Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $300 | $399 |