Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-H15 was revealed 2 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-H15 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-H15
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-H15 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | November 2009 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H15 offers outer measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H15 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 93 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specifications. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-H15 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-H15 will deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $566 |