Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very close but the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H15 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-H15 scores versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H15 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-H15
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | January 2010 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-H15 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 provides external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H15 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H15 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-H15 with its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-H15 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 lbs) | 550g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $871 |