Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-H15 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-H15 was unveiled 2 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-H15 matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-H15 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-H15
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-H15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-H15 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | March 2010 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-H15 enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-H15 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 93 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H15 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-H15 having a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-H15 will produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161g (0.35 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $349 |