Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H15 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H15 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-H15 grades against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-H15 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-H15
| WG-4 GPS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-H15 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 has external measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H15 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-H15 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-H15 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-H15 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 161 grams (0.35 lbs) | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $210 |